How To Deal With A Prick: Lessons from Seneca, Jocko, and Aurelius.

By Ciaran O'Regan

What Is A Prick?

Firstly, I want to clarify what exactly a "prick" is in the context of the vernacular used in modern English to describe a person. The below screen shot is of the "top definition" as voted in the Urban Dictionary at the time of writing.

 

(NB* In case I was not clear enough; for the purposes of this article I referring to el numero dos above; "derogatory term used to sum up the existance of a worthless asshole", and not the first definition, "a penis". It is always good to clarify your intentions in any aspect of life in which "a penis" is involved).

The reason I chose the word "prick", is simply because it is a word I have been exposed to in many the discussion with friends when an unpleasant person was the topic of choice (now, while I was probably mostly exposed to it through hearing my own vocal cords producing it rather than from my friends voices, I still have been exposed to it a lot). As such, it is the first descriptive word of its genre that springs to mind when I sat down to write this piece. My predilection towards vulgarity is probably more pronounced than most, much to the chagrin of my parents when growing up (and still to this day). But I digress.....   

Now, while I chose the word prick, you could substitute in any of your own locally appropriate synonyms used to describe a rather unpleasant individual. The same unpleasant person, depending on the part of the world they find themselves in, may be a prick/dickhead/asshole/fucker/fuckwit/fuckhead/twat/gobshite/gomie etc. The list of the descriptive words of this genre is never ending and constantly being added to in innovative and admirably creative ways. This innovation is necessary since calling someone a "cream-faced loon", as did Macbeth to his servant in the Shakespearean play, loses its impact after a while. 

Right, so now that I have provided a pseodo-academic definition of a distasteful descriptive word, along with having taken you admittedly unnecessarily far down the rabbit hole of English vulgarity: what makes a prick a prick in a practical sense?

Perception And Labelling

In its most basic sense, calling someone a prick all comes down to 3 step process. The first step involves an interaction. The second step involves our interpretation and subsequent perception of their actions in this interaction. The third step then involves labeling the person we have deemed to be distasteful, with a suitable word from our own personal vocabulary based off our perception of our interpretation of their actions in this interaction. This highly complex 3 step process summarized like this:

Step 1. We have an interaction with another homo sapien sapien (modern human) of our species.  

Step 2. This other ape we have interacted with (yes we are actually apes, this is not an insult but a factual declarative statement) has a characteristic(s) and/or performs an action(s) we deem to be distasteful/mean-spirited/aggressive etc.   

Step 3. We now decide to label this person a prick.  

 

“Everything we hear is an opinion, not a fact. Everything we see is a perspective, not the truth.” - Marcus Aurelius

 

Why Are They A Prick?

During my brief 27 years on this planet, I have thus far been able to identify and label 3 subcategories of prick through my own personal interactions and study:

1. The Ignorant Prick: This type of prick actually means well and do not want to upset us at all but are for whatever reason totally unaware of how they are being perceived. This ignorant prick may actually be trying to help us but simply does not have the social awareness or skills to understand how to impart their advice to us in a suitable way thereby coming across to us as unpleasant or domineering. 

2. The ASPD Prick: ASPD stands for "Antisocial Personality Disorders" as outlined in the "Diagnostic and Statistical manual for Mental Disorders".  Here are the criteria for ASPD in case you were curious. Under the heading of ASPD are both sociopath and psychopath. A prick under this category upset us because they are a basically a sociopath (which according to Dr. Martha Stout could be 4% of the population) or a psychopath (Coid et al. 2009 found 0.6% of people in Great Britain to be born psychopath). These types of people have the inability to feel remorse or guilt due to social trauma (sociopath), or a genetic defect resulting in an underdevelopment of the part of the brain responsible for emotions (psychopath). As such, a prick of this variety may upset us because they don't care about us or may even derive enjoyment from upsetting us.   

3. The Bully Prick: They are not ASPD and are just coming across as unpleasant because they are simply projecting their own insecurities and/or sadness out onto the world due to some inner turmoil they have yet to resolve. This type of prick has undergone some trauma themselves and tries to establish some feeling of empowerment by attempting to demonstrate dominance over other people. This is the classic bully. 

 

“All cruelty springs from weakness.” - Seneca

 

Why is This Breakdown and classification Important?

This is important for a very simple reason: it removes the influence of any emotional reaction from a potentially highly emotional situation by looking at a person's personality mechanistically as a collection of parts. Negative emotions such as anger or sadness simply cloud our judgment and rarely if ever result in good decision-making. Once we attempt to break a person down into their component parts, and try to look at where a person is coming from with regards to why they are a prick (or at the very least acknowledge that they are a prick for a reason outside of our control), the likelihood of developing a very clear and logical strategy to deal with this person is much higher as our negative emotion has been removed from the situation. 

Don't lose twice

They are what they are – should we get emotionally attached in a negative way we lose twice. We lose initially as we have allowed ourselves to get stressed (which results in a whole host of harmful physiological and psychological issues), then we lose again as we will probably make a not so good decision while in the stressed state. Essentially, they are just a "prick" because that is what we have chosen to label them as such due to an emotional reaction. Regardless of the reason for their actions, if we were to get upset we are allowing negative emotions to fester due to something they did not even mean to happen, or we are allowing them to win, or we are getting upset at someone who simply has a sloppy mind. For example:

1. Negative Emotion and Ignorant Pricks: If we get angry/sad over the actions of this type of prick, we are getting stressed due to the actions of someone who actually means well and does not mean any harm but is simply unaware of how they are being perceived. Ask yourself: how is allowing a negative emotional reaction to influence your decision-making process in this situation in any way rational?

2. Negative Emotion and ASPD Pricks: If we get angry/sad over the actions of this type of prick, we are getting stressed due to the actions of someone who actually means to cause us harm. By getting stressed here we are essentially allowing this person to win by giving them the reaction they want. We are gifting them a victory wrapped in a bow. Ask yourself: how is allowing a negative emotional reaction to influence your decision-making process in this situation in any way rational?

3. Negative Emotion and Bully Pricks: If we get angry/sad over the actions of this type of prick, we are getting stressed due to the actions of someone who actually means to cause us harm but their actions are coming from a place of inner turmoil and emotional weakness due to sloppy management of their own mind. Ask yourself: how is allowing a negative emotional reaction to influence your decision-making process in this situation in any way rational?

 

“If any man despises me, that is his problem. My only concern is not doing or saying anything deserving of contempt.” ― Marcus Aurelius

 

As you can see from the above 3 examples, allowing ourselves to get emotionally involved to the point where the negative emotion we are allowing to happen is clouding our judgment just doesn't stand up to logic

"But removing emotion from the situation is easier said than done" I hear you say.

"But I am not a robot" I hear you say.

"But I am only human and emotion is normal" I hear you say. 

So what is my response to these statements I imagine many of you to be pondering?

Dealing with pricks is like lifting weights

Think of how we deal with pricks just like how we think of lifting weights. When we lift weights week on week we keep getting stronger (Bro, do you even lift?). This physiological stress followed by subsequent recovery allows us to lift a heavier weight next time for the same reps, or simply to lift the same weight for the same reps with much less relative effort. Dealing with lighter weights initially allows basically allows us to throw heavier weights around eventually. 

Dealing with difficult people is the very same.  

When we get used to practicing dealing with difficult people, even if just practicing staying calm when someone cuts us off in traffic (think light weight), we are strengthening our ability to deal with difficult people. It really is like a muscle. Dealing in a constructive way with unavoidable adversity is just an opportunity to get better with dealing with future unavoidable adversity. Every obstacle in the form of a difficult person we are forced to deal with is just an opportunity to get better at dealing with future difficult people.

 

"The impediment to action advances action. What stands in the way becomes the way." - Marcus Aurelius

 

This is all very well in theory, but how do I remove emotion enough to allow for unclouded rationality you may find yourself asking?

Detach. Calm Down. Mind control.

Jocko hits yet another home run with this gem of simplicity: 

(Side note: someone should really make a book of Jockos tweets. He really is a blackbelt at getting powerful lessons across in usually way less than 140 characters)

(Side note: someone should really make a book of Jockos tweets. He really is a blackbelt at getting powerful lessons across in usually way less than 140 characters)

Become detached. It really is that simple. 

Learning to become detached is difficult but very possible. This is a simple concept but not an easy one. Practicing detachment is subject to the same simile I used above regarding weight lifting. It can be trained and improved upon with effort and time. There are also a bunch of approaches we could use to trigger our detachment when dealing with difficult people. For example here are just a few I have used as triggers when experimenting with what works for me:

 1. Look at the situation for what is really is, and acknowledge that getting upset and allowing a negative emotional reaction to cloud our decision making usually leads to nothing good.

or,

2. Look at the ephemeral nature of not just our lives, but of our whole existence as a species. On top of this, realize that this stress is not just a blip on the radar of our lives, but that our negative stress means as much to the universe at large as moving a single grain of sand from one spot on a beach to another means to the ocean. Nature does not give a fuck about us and we are just here to spend our short time before we return our borrowed carbon to the universe having a laugh so stop wasting time and energy dwelling in negativity. 

or my personally preferred option due to its simplicity and brevity,

3. See this stressor as an opportunity to make yourself better and sharpen your social tools. Or, as Mr. Willink likes to say in any situation involving unavoidable adversity (using literally as few words as possible);

 

"Good." - Jocko Willink

 

management of negative emotion is like water filling a sink...

The more and more we practice this concept of emotional management the better we will get at it. Removing negative emotion such as anger or sadness from the situation is not about becoming a robot and not feeling emotions, it is about seeing the negative emotion occur like water filling up a sink. Before the water fills the sink causing an overflow, however, we just pull the plug and let the negative emotion go down the drain. The better we get at managing our emotions, the less water will be able to collect in the sink before we pull the plug. This shit takes constant practice however and I honestly see it as a skill that has no ceiling to its development.

It is all about perception

It is up to us how we deal with pricks. Will we allow ourselves to get emotionally entangled in a downward spiral of negativity leading to subsequent irrationality in our thought processes, or will we see these situations as opportunities to sharpen our social tools. 

It is WAY WAY WAY beyond the scope of this piece to break down every single possible solution to dealing with people who may trouble us. In fact, I think such an article would be infinitely long and infinitely complex due to how varied and multifaceted our weird species is. Humans love getting caught up in gossip and taking other people's negativity to heart far too much. Fuck knows how many times I have heard someone in an enraged voice saying things like "who do they think they are?" or "what right have they to say that to me?" or some other nonsense. Limp Bizkit put it best in their glorious song "Break Stuff";

 

"It's all about that he-says, she-says bullshit

I think you better quit, let the shit slip

Or you'll be leaving with a fat lip

It's all about that he-says she-says bullshit" - Limp Bizkit

 

Our closest mammalian relatives are the chimpanzee and the bonobo and these species solve social problems in polarized but much more simple ways that do not allow for taking each other's negativity to heart and allowing it to fester. Chimpanzees have a very patriarchal society and when they have problems with each other just fuck each other up in vicious fights. On the other hand, bonobos have a more egalitarian and matriarchal society and don't really have any conflict because rather than resolving issues through violence, they substitute sex for aggression. (side note: this is probably why we do not see many bonobos in zoos as all the promiscuity may result in some difficult questions directed at prude parents from their sheltered kids). Humans are far more complex however (which is quite unfortunate as living like a bonobo seems like a good old time. But I digress yet again...). 

As such when looking at our lives in a logical fashion, we cannot see difficult people as “bad” or label them as pricks and view them in an emotional manner as it then it leaves our happiness in life up to pure randomness. With this labeling and emotional investment in negative areas, happiness and peace are left up to chance because theoretically, by sheer mathematical probability, it is possible that;

1. We may be lucky and never come across a single difficult person like this ever again in our lives,

or just as equally likely,

2. We may be unlucky and forced to interact with a difficult person that has characteristics worthy of labeling a prick every single day of the rest of our lives if they are a difficult colleague or family member that we cannot escape due to circumstances out of our control. We could, by utter chance be subject to a series of random unfortunate events which could result in the potential for every job we will ever have for the remainder of our lives containing one colleague that has the characteristics of a prick. Therefore, if we allow ourselves to see this kind of person as a negative and adopt a soft victim mentality, our lives life will fucking suck. 

 

"You don't have to turn this into something. It doesn't have to upset you." Marcus Aurelius

 

The choice is up to us

All I am trying to get across with this piece is the there is benefit to at least attempting to break a problematic person down into their various possible components (figuratively and not literally a la Dexter). This process of attempted mechanistic analysis facilitates a much more calm and rational response from us, rather than the emotionally driven reaction the vast majority of us have been guilty of in the past. Once we get into the habit of seeing difficult people as what they are - just a genetic code that has been expressed through whatever social and environmental influences were undergone, we can then see them as a tool to improve our ability to deal with future difficult people. As a social animal, there is a game to play as a human. We can play this game in a lot more of a stress-free manner if we do not allow our happiness to be left up to random luck.

 

“If you are pained by external things, it is not they that disturb you, but your own judgment of them. And it is in your power to wipe out that judgment now.” - Marcus Aurelius

If you like what you read here, then please click here and add your best email to the bottom of the page. I will only contact you when I have new content and direct email is the best way to notify you as social media algorithms are not always the most facilitating.

High Horse Assholery - Lessons on offering fitness advice from Dunning-Kruger and "The book of the samurai"

By Ciaran O'Regan

I have been deeply interested in fitness and nutrition for over 11 years.

In such time I have accumulated a shitload of information: some being good, and unfortunately, quite a lot, being not so good. The nutrition and health fields are ones in which once somebody dives in, they find themselves in a never-ending maze of rabbit holes going in an infinite number of directions with the vast majority of these directions being gimmicky and not worth a fuck for the most part.

The subject of nutrition and health is super close and personal to people due to their own insecurities as well as emotional attachments to certain ways of living and eating. On top of this there is the obvious factor of their own body image and health. Something I wish I knew earlier (but am still refining all the time), were more socially intelligent ways of imparting this information about this emotionally charged area onto other people.

Due to eating and health being such emotionally charged topics, along with my own history in the fitness industry, the topic of fitness and nutrition is a great example for me to shine some light on the topic of Advice. 

In retrospect, I have most definitely given health and fitness advice (whether solicited or not) in a crude, and quite frankly; pretentious manner.

I must have come across like a serious dickhead. The reason I cared so much, and was so passionate, was that being physically fit and healthy means so much to me as a person. The lifestyle of hard physical training and attention to nutrition has given me so much in terms of physical health and confidence as well as healthy, intelligent, and like-minded friends.

Improving certain physical traits such as strength, mobility, speed, and conditioning, has also given me a sense of purpose and direction regardless of what else was going on in other aspects of my life. In all truth, physical health in the form of training and nutrition is the framework around which I have built the rest of my life. 

When I really go deep in analysis however, my inability to communicate my knowledge and passion, in a manner appropriate to where that person was with regards to their ability to receive the information, must have come from three sources: 

The first of which were my own insecurities.

These insecurities must have stemmed from the fact that I was once an unhealthy kid myself. I was one of those proper chubby sedentary little lads who would easily put away a full box of some sugared cereal while playing PlayStation. However in my teens, I essentially went from an overweight young lad who was unsure of himself, to getting some abzzz and some muscles after taking up strength training and the eating a lot of chicken and broccoli. I think the fact that I had been able to transform my own body, while still retaining a legacy of certain thought processes rooted in insecurity from the chubby days, led me to feel a sense of superiority over people who had not transformed themselves yet: hence the pretension when telling people how to do it themselves. 

 

“All cruelty springs from weakness.” - Seneca

 

The second, was the way a lot of the providers of health and nutrition information online, and in books, actually impart their information

This vastness of information available, and the fact that quite a large proportion of it is delivered from seemingly omnipotent, know it all, grandiose-guruish-gobshites (how was that for alliteration?) doesn't help. I think it potentially increases the likelihood that impressionable young people like myself, who were unsure of their place in the world, would adopt some of their know-it-all ways of communicating.

Such ways of communicating involve the use of definite statements, pretension, and just general high-horse assholery for (purposeful) lack of a more eloquent description.

Finally, The main reason I think I gave advice like a prick, was the simple fact that I actually knew fuck all about what I was on about.

I did not know enough to realize how little I actually knew. I basically had enough knowledge to think I knew everything, but not enough to realize I was not even scratching the surface. 

 

"The fool doth think he is wise, but the wise man knows himself to be a fool." - Shakespeare

 

This is an all too common phenomenon called the Dunning-Kruger Effect:

 

"The Dunning–Kruger effect is a cognitive bias in which low ability individuals suffer from illusory superiority, mistakenly assessing their ability as much higher than it really is. Dunning and Kruger attributed this bias to a metacognitive inability of those of low ability to recognize their ineptitude and evaluate their ability accurately." - Wikipedia

 

(Note: Before I go any further I want to just highlight how much I fucking love the phrase "illusory superiority". It is so beautiful in both its language and meaning. But I digress....)

For example, when giving nutrition advice to people looking to improve their body composition (lose fat and gain muscle), I used to place huge importance on the minutia like "superfoods", supplements, meal timing, the "anabolic window" etc. I did not know enough to see that the big picture stuff that got you the biggest return on investment, were simply managing your caloric intake and eating sufficient protein throughout the day. I was 100% missing the forest for the trees and did not know enough to realize what was actually most important. I basically only knew enough to hang myself. 

The below twitter post I came across pretty much sums up the Dunning-Kruger effect in action and wonderfully illustrates my (hopefully) once lofty perch up on "Mount Stupid".

So what is there to learn here from my past fuck ups When giving advice?

Before you give advice to anyone, on any topic, make sure that you meet these two criteria:

1. You genuinely actually want to help people learn, and are not simply offering advice to feel some sense of superiority over your victim.

2. Most importantly: you actually know what the fuck you are on about regarding the topic you wish to opine on.

So assuming one is neither an insecure dickhead, nor ignorant fool, how does one actually set about giving advice? - Enter "The book of the samurai"

Had I come across the below section of the "Hagakure: The Book of the Samurai" by Yamamoto Tsunetomo years ago, I potentially could have saved my victims from an ear beating, and myself from some bad karma.

“To give a person one’s opinion and correct his faults is an important thing. It is compassionate and comes first in matters of service. But the way of doing this is extremely difficult. To discover the good and bad points of an individual is an easy thing, and to give an opinion concerning them is easy, too. For the most part, people think that they are being kind by saying the things that others find distasteful or difficult to say. But if not received well they think that there is nothing more to be done. This is completely worthless. It is the same as bringing shame to a person by slandering him. It is nothing more than getting it off ones chest.

To give a person an opinion one must first judge well whether that person is of the disposition to receive it or not. One must become close with him and make sure that he continually trusts one’s word. Approaching subjects that are dear to him, seek the best way to speak and to be well understood. Judge the occasion and determine whether it is better by letter or at the time of leave-taking. Praise his good points and use every device to encourage him, perhaps by talking about one’s own faults without touching on his but so that they will occur to him. Have him receive this in the way that a man would drink water when his throat is dry, and it will be an opinion that will correct faults.

This is extremely difficult. If a person’s fault is a bad habit of some years prior, by and large it wont be remedied. I have had this experience myself. To be intimate with one’s comrades, correcting each other’s faults, and being of one mind to be of use to the master is the great compassion of a retainer. By bringing shame to a person, how could one expect to make him a better man?” – Yamamoto Tsunetomo.

 

As you can see there is an art to the concept of giving advice. For a large chunk of his life, Tsunetomo was himself an aid to a very powerful Samurai lord, and as part of his job was essentially a professional advice giverAs such he had put a lot of thought into the best ways of imparting his advice to his master. 

learn from my mistakes, then internalize the lessons on advice "The book of the samurai" can teach us. 

The next time you genuinely wish to help someone, and it is a topic in which you are sure you are not sitting on "Mount Stupid", use the invaluable lessons outlined above by Tsunetomo nearly 300 years ago.

Giving advice to someone is a huge responsibility, please treat it as such.  

 

“If they’ve made a mistake, correct them gently and show them where they went wrong. If you can’t do that, then the blame lies with you. Or no one.” – Marcus Aurelius.

 

If you like what you read here, then please click here and add your best email to the bottom of the page. I will only contact you when I have new content and direct email is the best way to notify you as social media algorithms are not always the most facilitating.

Death, Destruction, Misery, and True Appreciation - Lessons from Jocko

By Ciaran O'Regan

We all know the scene.

As I write this I am sitting in a Starbucks. I am debating to myself whether or not the quality of the internet and the availability of elbow space and electricity sockets really does make up for the fact that the coffee in the small privately owned café across the street is in my opinion of a far greater quality.

The people walking past in the street to whom I find myself throwing a glance from time to time are going about their lives in a manner typical of 2016 Ireland.

Humans of all ages, socioeconomic backgrounds, race, and nationality are getting on with each other in peace. They are cooperating in accordance with both the obvious written laws such as not taking that which is not yours and the unwritten ones such as the gentlemanly expectation to briefly stop and help a young mother carry her babies’ pram up a set of steps with no payment other than a genuinely appreciative smile accompanied by a thanks/thank you/cheers/sound or other locally appropriate synonym. While I am writing this using a Microsoft Office package and on a MacBook Pro, the man to my left is studying case law for what I assume are upcoming exams in the local university and the man to my right is frequently giggling as he watches Netflix on his I-pad. 

Life is good here. In fact, I would go so far as to say life here right now is fucking tremendous.

The thought running through my mind is whether or not these conscious objects of my observation really do appreciate how good the circumstances they currently find themselves in, really are. The thought has only occurred to me as up to recently I took all this for granted.

I am a firm believer in living life at extremes.

  • While I train hard in my physical fitness and martial arts training by relentlessly paying attention to the little details and regularly bringing myself to horrific levels of discomfort and fatigue, I also recover hard by controlling my stress levels and increasingly partake in various forms of meditation and mindfulness practice.

  • While I pay attention to my macronutrient requirements and the micronutrient content of my diet that is, for the most part, made up of high-quality proteins and veggies, I have no issue with going out from time to time with friends and family and fitting things like ice cream or a few beers into my caloric intake (which in the big picture does fuck all to negatively affect my body comp or health and in fact improves my health in my eyes due to the social experience that accompanies it outweighing any negative physiological impact of the food itself).

  • While I work hard by putting my focus on the task at hand and hustling to get jobs done, I also socialize hard (for want of a better word) by paying as much attention as possible to my friends and family when I am with them by doing such things as ignoring the allure of my phone drawing my simple ape brain towards the addictive dopamine bursts achieved from the strategically designed notification alerts.

To paraphrase a line I heard from the very clever and inspirational Gary Vaynerchuk, I live my life at extremes and achieve my balance through the net rather than living in mediocrity.

While I have been gradually improving my ability to operate on a day to day basis with this mentality for years; it was not until the last few months however that I started to apply this same viewpoint of operating at extremes towards the appreciation for what I have.

I may not have been born to a wealthy family by western standards, but relative to a vast chunk of the world I have a winning ticket. 

The prizes that have been afforded to me through my winnings in the genetic and geographic lotteries have meant that the bottom rungs of Maslow's Hierarchy of Needs have been met. I have food, shelter, clean air, political stability, physical safety, education, affection and appreciation for and from family and friends, and find myself ultimately on a path towards self-actualization at the peak of Maslow's pyramid. It was not until I started listening to a podcast by author, navy seal veteran, Brazilian jiu-jitsu black belt and all round inspirational character Jocko Willink on his simply called “Jocko Podcast”: that I realized just how fucking lucky I am.

Regularly listening to Jocko talk about his own personal experiences from war, along with his reading of extracts from books pertaining to the most horrible shit imaginable has afforded me with a whole new outlook on life as the penny finally dropped regarding just how bad life can be for a human.

Throughout my life I have been subjected to the idea of war in movies, documentaries, books, and the news media over and over: sometimes accompanied with negativity but more often than not with ideals of glorification, honor, and justification. I think I simply got numb to the realities of what I was seeing. For some reason unknown to me it was not until I heard this admirably introspective and self-aware former combatant read particularly impactful extracts and talk about his own experiences that the realities of war sunk in. I do not know why this particular content impacted me so much more than any other but it has.

Just a few examples of such horrible descriptions: 

  • In episode 12 he talked about the beyond comprehensible pain and misery experienced by a Scottish soldier at the hands of his captors in “The Forgotten Highlander” by Alistair Urquhart. Such misery includes having to resort to putting maggots on his sores to eat the dead skin so the tissue necrosis did not spread.

  • In episode 16 he talked about the Rwandan genocide from the perspective of the culprits wielding the machetes in a book called “Machete Season: The Killers in Rwanda Speak” by Jean Hatzfield. The people interviewed for the making of that book, coldly described how they took off their Sunday best clothes and put on their "work" clothes after church to set about hacking up their neighbors and family members with machetes simply due to tribal affiliations.

  • In episode 18 he talked about the experiences of a Russian Soldier involved in fighting the Chechen rebels from a book called “One Soldier's War” by Arkady Babchenko. In this book, Babchenko details what it was like to be assaulted and beaten by his own comrades while on base and then witness his friends tortured and killed by the enemy out on the battlefield.

  • Finally in what was in my opinion (and his apparently if you see the tweet below), the most heavy of episodes, he talked about the My Lai massacre from the book "Four Hours in My Lai" by Michael Bilton and Kevin Sim. I will not even try to describe the details of this episode: it needs to be experienced to be understood.

If you only ever listen to a single episode of Jocko Podcast in its entirety make it  this one.

If you only ever listen to a single episode of Jocko Podcast in its entirety make it this one.

 

War is fucking shit. 

War is up there with only with natural disasters as being the worst thing that can happen to a person. It is at one end of the extreme. The death, destruction, and misery that accompanies it is as bad as life can get.

Looking at the extremes of what is possible in life, if even from a literary and anecdotal perspective, has given me a new lens through which to view everything I have. It took hearing about a Navy Seals’ take on the most disgusting and traumatic shit possible for a person to experience to realize just how good this shitty coffee really is.

IF YOU FIND YOURSELF WITH THE ABILITY AND FREE TIME TO READ THIS ARTICLE, IT MOST LIKELY APPLIES TO YOU.

Don’t get caught focusing on the minutia and missing the big picture of your life. Don’t allow yourself to focus on the seemingly negative aspects of life or worrying about things outside of your control. Don’t get caught up in the bustle of commercial life convincing you that you need to buy ridiculously expensive well-marketed bullshit to serve no purpose other than to feed your ego and insecurities

There are unfortunately quite a lot of people in society around us with a victim mentality. They give out about not getting this, or not getting that. They feel unlucky and jealous of people they know or even see on reality TV or social media. They blame other people for their failings. They allow life to happen to them rather than happen to it. 

Appreciate the fact that simply by pure luck, you are not living in a literal hell on earth.

Next time you find yourself starting to get upset over some person who has said something you didn't like, some celebrity couple break up, some order a waiter messed up, some promotion you didn't get, some "fashionable" shoes you are unable to afford or some other totally insignificant bullshit, use this (potentially) newfound awareness of what is possible to go through as part of the human experience to cultivate true appreciation for the opportunities afforded to you in life because you are not living in hell

 

Know the darkness” – Jocko Willink

 

- Ciaran. 

 

If you like what you read here, then please click here and add your best email to the bottom of the page. I will only contact you when I have new content and direct email is the best way to notify you as social media algorithms are not always the most facilitating.

Don’t Fuck Around

By Ciaran O'Regan

Let’s say you live the “perfect life”.

You set out on a journey to become the best you can be at your field and end up becoming one of the greatest and most influential contributors to that area in all of history. Your name ends up in the same lists as Muhammad Ali, Michael Jordan, Steve Jobs and Bill Gates.

You live a life of overcoming obstacles, relentless self-improvement and hard graft. You experience the inevitable failures and problems along the way but you end up accomplishing as much if not more than anyone else ever has and maybe ever will in that field.

Let us also assume you have enjoyed yourself along the way and are totally at peace with what you have done with your life in those last few moments prior to returning your temporarily borrowed carbon to the universe.

Now let’s say your life has been a complete and utter shitshow

You spend your life faffing about and fucking around going in no clear direction with no focus or aim. You work a job to simply facilitate the maintenance of your rudderless existence. You hide yourself away from your seemingly inconsolable and originless frustrations with a dependency or dependencies on some substances (alchohol or drug abuse) or behaviors (reality TV, gambling, lottery tickets, excessive social media use, celebrity gossip, shopping etc).

In the grand scheme of things the aforementioned universe could not give less of a fuck either way what you do with your allotted time.

Whether you live a life consisting of a passionate and driven quest towards self-actualization or whether you live an existence based around production and consumption clouded by self imposed distraction; it doesn’t matter.

At the end of the day, should we as a species and culture manage to avoid self destruction, disease, natural disasters, or simply being hit by giant rocks from space and wiped out like the dinosaurs: the sun will still eventually explode like a giant reset button anyway.

We are still fucked.

This however is NOT a bad thing. It is actually a fact that you can use to motivate yourself. Acceptance of the finite nature of everything is about as powerful a stimulus to get off your arse and enjoy yourself as you could find.

While nothing matters in the grand scheme of things, when it comes to what you do with your life; everything matters.

A beautifully eloquent quote I heard somewhere that summarizes this whole philosophy goes as follows:

 

“I do what is important to me, not because it is important, but because it is important to me.” - Unknown

 

Realistically, all we can do as individuals is to live a life of passionate pursuit, fervently going after whatever paths excites us the most while simultaneously trying our best to leave the world in a little bit of a better state when we leave than if we had not been born at all. If everyone was to look at life like this I would hazard a bet there would be a lot less unhappiness and negativity. 

Life is too fun to waste time on the negative going in no clear direction. There are too many cool people to meet, too many beautiful places to see, too much delicious food to eat, and too many obstacles to overcome and learn from.

 

“Suppose that a god announced that you were going to die tomorrow “or the day after”. Unless you were a complete coward you wouldn’t kick up a fuss about which day it was-what difference could it make? Now recognize that the difference between years from now and tomorrow are just as small” – Marcus Aurelius

 

Now go get it done. Don’t fuck around.

 

“We have two lives, and the second begins when we realize we only have one.” - Confucius

 

- Ciaran 

If you like what you read here, then please click here and add your best email to the bottom of the page. I will only contact you when I have new content and direct email is the best way to notify you as social media algorithms are not always the most facilitating.